Teal vs Enhancv: Free Plans, ATS & Templates Compared

Last Updated: September 2026. This comparison uses official Teal and Enhancv documentation checked on September 22, 2026. Pricing and plan screens can change, and Enhancv currently publishes conflicting trial language across official pages, so the live checkout screen should be treated as the final billing reference.

Teal is a career-management platform with an AI resume builder, job tracker, job-description matcher, and Chrome extension for saving job listings. Enhancv is a resume and career-application platform centered on resume design, AI writing, ATS analysis, and tailored applications.

That distinction matters because a feature checklist can make the products look more similar than they feel in practice. A person applying to many jobs may care more about tracking and version control than about decorative templates, while someone preparing one high-touch resume may care more about layout, presentation, and guided writing.

Teal and Enhancv overlap, but their strongest workflows are organized around different parts of the job search.

What Teal and Enhancv are built to do

Teal is built as a job-search workspace first, with resume creation, tailoring, job tracking, browser capture, contacts, and application organization connected in one place. Enhancv is built around creating and improving application documents, but its current site also includes job tracking and a Chrome extension.

The difference is therefore one of emphasis, not a simple tracker-versus-builder split. Both platforms address resume creation and job matching, yet Teal puts the application pipeline closer to the center, while Enhancv puts more emphasis on the resume itself, visual customization, and guided content work.

That makes the comparison more useful when it is framed around workflow stages. Ask what you need to do before an application is submitted, not just which feature names appear in a pricing grid.

Quick comparison matrix

The table below summarizes the current product differences that matter most for a job seeker. It is a factual snapshot checked on September 22, 2026, not a scorecard that assigns an overall winner.

Current pricing and free-plan limits

Teal's current official pricing page lists Teal+ at $13 every 7 days, $29 every 30 days, or $79 every 90 days. The same official comparison material describes Free Forever access with unlimited resume creation and unlimited job tracking, while selected AI, analysis, and matching functions have usage limits. See the official Teal pricing page .

Teal's published free-tier details are unusually important because "free" does not simply mean a short trial. The current plan comparison lists 10 templates, a limited surfaced-keyword view, basic resume analysis, and limited AI generation. That means a job seeker can keep using the core tracker and resume workflow without paying, but may hit limits when tailoring heavily.

Enhancv is harder to summarize with one universal price because its official pages currently disagree. The dedicated pricing page checked on September 22, 2026 shows a $4.99/month Basic plan and $19.99/month Pro, with discounted longer billing options also displayed. Its Help Center, however, describes 7 days of free access and the limits of the free experience.

Enhancv's Help Center also documents a free experience with all templates and design tools, Enhancv branding, and a maximum of 12 section items. Pro removes branding, expands sections, and adds features such as real-time content suggestions and ATS checking. The Enhancv Help Center is the clearest source for those limits.

For billing, compare the full period rather than the headline monthly number. A weekly subscription can look inexpensive until it is repeated many times, while a longer plan can reduce the effective rate but may make sense only when the search will last long enough to use it.

Teal free-plan details

Teal currently documents unlimited resume creation and unlimited job tracking on the free plan. Its July 2026 official comparison lists 10 free resume templates, the top five surfaced job-description keywords, basic resume analysis, and limited credits for AI bullet, summary, and cover-letter generation. The exact remaining credit count is displayed inside the account and can change as product limits evolve.

Enhancv free-access details

Enhancv's Help Center states that free access is available for 7 days without a card. It includes the template and design library, but the document carries Enhancv branding and is limited to 12 section items. Pro adds no branding, unlimited section items, ATS checking, content suggestions, and a larger usage allowance.

Resume builders and templates

Teal's resume builder is designed around a reusable career-history source that can feed multiple versions. Its official import help supports existing PDF and DOCX resumes, LinkedIn profiles, and pasted text. The workflow is useful when the same experience needs to be represented differently for different job descriptions.

Enhancv puts more weight on the visual construction of the document. Its builder uses modular sections, design controls, templates, and content guidance to create a polished resume. The result is a more design-forward editing experience, but the best template is still the one that preserves clear reading order and role-relevant evidence.

Template count by itself is a weak comparison metric. More templates do not automatically mean better outcomes. A better test is whether the chosen template fits the employer, keeps the hierarchy obvious, and can be exported without introducing formatting problems.

For a conservative corporate application, a simple structure may make review and parsing easier. For creative, portfolio-adjacent, or design-sensitive work, visual differentiation may be more useful. A serious job search can legitimately use more than one resume presentation instead of forcing every application through one layout. To see how both platforms rank across the wider market, explore our comprehensive 2026 AI resume builder benchmark.

The practical difference is often the editing workflow: structured version control versus presentation-focused document building.

AI writing and job-specific tailoring

Both platforms use AI to adapt application content, but the interaction model differs. Teal exposes tools for bullets, professional summaries, cover letters, interview practice, and job-description matching. Enhancv emphasizes AI-assisted rewriting, job matching, content suggestions, and tailored application documents.

A useful distinction is control versus automation. Teal's workflow encourages maintaining a larger source of achievements and selectively activating the experience that matches the role. Enhancv's AI messaging emphasizes guided rewriting and a job-specific editing cycle. Neither approach removes the need for factual review.

The most useful tailoring process reduces repetitive editing without changing the facts. A faster generator is not a real efficiency gain if every generated bullet has to be rewritten because the wording drifted away from the candidate's actual experience.

Tailoring for many jobs

For a high-volume search, Teal's saved jobs, job descriptions, resume versions, and reusable work-history source can reduce context switching. The product documentation describes a comprehensive source resume approach that lets users select the most relevant content for each target role.

Enhancv can also tailor a resume to a job description and provide ATS-oriented guidance. The deciding factor is usually workflow friction: whether you need an application pipeline around your resumes or a more concentrated editing environment around the document.

ATS checks, match scores, and parsing

A resume-tool score is a diagnostic generated by that product; it is not a universal hiring probability. Teal provides job-description matching and resume analysis, while Enhancv currently advertises a dedicated Resume Checker and exact-job ATS matching.

Teal's Job Matcher is available to free and paid users, with free users seeing a limited surfaced-keyword view and Teal+ users seeing broader keyword access. Enhancv's current Resume Checker advertises 27 checks covering content, layout, and technical ATS compatibility, while its ATS Hub describes scoring against an exact job advertisement.

The ATS debate also needs context. An applicant tracking system can parse a document into fields, support search or matching, and feed later workflow steps. It is not necessarily a single automatic reject gate. Vendor studies can illuminate one test setup, but they do not prove how every employer's configuration behaves.

Enhancv's September 2026 vendor research argues that reading order can matter more than whether a resume is single- or two-column, and reports strong parsing results in its own tests. Those findings should be treated as vendor research rather than a universal promise. The safer practical approach is to keep reading order clear and test the exported file before using a complex layout for a high-stakes application.

A match score is useful for diagnosis, but it should not be treated as an interview probability.

Common ATS myths worth ignoring

• There is no verified universal percentage of resumes that are automatically rejected by every ATS.
• A two-column resume does not automatically fail every parser, although layout complexity can create risks in some systems.
• A third-party match score does not equal the score used by an employer's ATS.
• Adding keywords that are not supported by your real experience can improve a diagnostic number while reducing credibility.

Job tracking and Chrome extensions

Teal's Job Tracker remains a central part of its workflow. Its official documentation supports bookmarking jobs, tracking stages, adding notes, organizing companies and contacts, and connecting job information to the resume workflow.

Teal's Job Search Companion is a Chrome extension for desktop and laptop use. The official product page advertises support for more than 40 job boards, and the documentation explains that supported listings can be captured automatically while unsupported pages can be added manually.

Enhancv should no longer be described as lacking a tracker. Its current official site advertises an AI Job Application Tracker and a Chrome extension that can save jobs from sources such as LinkedIn, Indeed, Glassdoor, Greenhouse, and Workday.

The practical question is how deeply you want the tracker integrated into your process. A job seeker who wants a persistent pipeline may value tracker depth differently from someone who mainly wants a polished resume and only occasionally tracks applications.

For mobile-first job searching, note that Teal's extension itself is documented for desktop and laptop Chrome. The web platform should not be confused with extension support on mobile browsers.

Browser capture becomes more useful when saved jobs, stages, notes, reminders, and resume versions stay connected (compare our in-depth Huntr vs Teal job search tracker review to evaluate dedicated CRM alternatives).

Exports and application workflow

Teal's current official export help says PDF is the only export option for resumes and cover letters. That is a material limitation if you routinely need an editable Word document for a recruiter, coach, or portal that explicitly requests DOCX.

Enhancv also presents PDF as its preferred format and its AI builder advertises ATS-tested PDF export. That makes PDF the normal output path in both workflows, but it also means a job seeker should check the employer's application requirements before assuming a PDF is accepted.

Teal can import a DOCX or PDF resume, which is useful when moving an existing resume into the platform. This difference is easy to miss: a service can accept Word input while still producing PDF-only output.

Real cost over a three-month search

The cleanest price comparison is to normalize billing periods. Using the current official Teal figures, three 30-day charges would total $87, while the 90-day plan would be $79. The $13 seven-day rate would be about $169 across 13 weeks if it were renewed throughout the same period.

Enhancv is more variable because its official pricing surfaces are not fully consistent. At the dedicated pricing-page figure of $19.99/month for Pro, three months would be $59.97 before any change in displayed billing terms. That is an arithmetic example, not a guaranteed checkout price.

Those figures are arithmetic, not a value ranking. The economic comparison depends on how long the search lasts, whether the free tier is sufficient, and whether premium AI or design functions are needed throughout the search.

Choose Teal if your workflow looks like this

Teal fits a workflow where application organization is a first-class requirement. That includes keeping many saved roles in one place, tracking stages, linking a resume version to a job, and repeatedly tailoring from a larger work-history source.

• You are applying to many jobs and need one application pipeline.
• You want long-term free access to resume creation and job tracking (start free with Teal).
• You prefer to control which experience bullets appear for each role.
• You use desktop Chrome and want to capture listings from supported job boards.
• You want job information and resume versions connected in one workspace.

Choose Enhancv if your workflow looks like this

Enhancv fits a workflow where the resume itself is the main project. That can be useful when you need strong control over presentation, guided content suggestions, ATS checking, and a polished application document.

• You care heavily about visual presentation and section-level customization (see how Enhancv compares to template-focused platforms in our Teal vs Kickresume and Kickresume vs Enhancv analyses).
• You want integrated content guidance while editing.
• You want a dedicated ATS checker alongside the resume builder.
• You are willing to verify current trial and billing terms before subscribing.
• You want resume creation plus current tracking and Chrome-extension features.

Use the workflow that matches your bottleneck rather than choosing from a single overall score.

Edge cases and gotchas

The biggest mistakes in a Teal-versus-Enhancv decision come from outdated assumptions. Product pages change, features move, and third-party comparison tables often lag behind official documentation.

Corporate ATS applications

Do not choose a design merely because it looks impressive. Export the PDF, inspect the text layer, and verify that dates, headings, employers, and contact details remain in a sensible reading order. A tool's ATS-friendly claim is not a guarantee across every employer configuration.

When an editable document is required

Teal's current official documentation is explicit that PDF is the only export format. Enhancv's documentation also centers on PDF. When a recruiter or portal specifically requests DOCX, plan a separate editable-file workflow rather than assuming either service will create the required file.

Mobile-first job searching

The Teal Chrome extension is currently documented for desktop and laptop Chrome. The web platform should not be confused with extension support on mobile browsers.

Using both tools

Using both can make sense when one platform manages application organization while the other handles a high-touch resume editing need. The risk is duplicate editing. Maintain one authoritative source of career facts and move only verified content between platforms.

Trial and renewal checks

Before subscribing, check the live checkout screen for trial length, renewal amount, billing interval, and cancellation timing. This is especially important for Enhancv because its official pages currently contain conflicting trial descriptions.

What the current evidence does and does not prove

Official documentation is strongest for pricing, feature availability, and plan limitations. Vendor studies can be useful for understanding a provider's testing setup, but they should remain clearly attributed. Forum posts are useful for discovering pain points worth investigating, but a small number of user reports cannot establish a general product limitation.

This article is therefore a documentation-based comparison rather than an independent laboratory test of interview conversion, recruiter response rates, or parser accuracy across every ATS on the market. Making that distinction explicit is important because software comparison pages often mix vendor claims with independent evidence.

For example, Enhancv's current ATS research reports strong parsing results in its own tests, while user forums include occasional reports of layout or matching problems. Those sources answer different questions. Vendor tests show what happened under the vendor's chosen conditions; user reports show that real workflows can vary.

Use match scores and ATS checks as diagnostics that help you inspect the resume. Do not treat them as universal employer scores or guarantees of an interview.

Frequently asked questions

Is Teal free?

Yes. Teal has a Free Forever tier with unlimited resume creation and unlimited job tracking, while some AI generation, keyword visibility, analysis, and other advanced features are more limited than Teal+.

Is Enhancv free?

Enhancv offers free access, but its Help Center currently describes that access as 7 days, with branding and a 12-section-item limit. Its pricing site currently contains different trial language, so verify the live checkout terms.

Which is cheaper over three months?

At current Teal monthly pricing, three 30-day charges total $87, while the 90-day plan is $79. At the dedicated Enhancv pricing-page figure of $19.99/month for Pro, three months would be $59.97, but official pricing surfaces vary, so use your live checkout amount for a final calculation.

Does Teal export DOCX?

Not according to the current official export help. Teal currently documents PDF as the only export option, although it can import existing PDF or DOCX resumes.

Does Enhancv have an ATS checker?

Yes. Enhancv currently advertises a Resume Checker with 27 checks and an ATS Hub that can compare a resume with an exact job advertisement and identify missing keywords and content gaps.

Does Enhancv have a job tracker?

Yes. Current official Enhancv pages advertise an AI Job Application Tracker and a Chrome extension for saving jobs. Older comparison articles that say Enhancv has no tracking are no longer aligned with the current official product pages.

What does Teal's match score mean?

It is a product-level indication of how a resume aligns with a selected job description. It is useful for finding keyword and content gaps, but it is not a universal ATS score or a probability of getting an interview.

Are Enhancv templates ATS-friendly?

Enhancv currently markets ATS compatibility and publishes parsing research. The practical answer is template-specific and employer-specific: a layout can parse correctly in one setup while a different employer configuration may behave differently.

Can I use Teal and Enhancv together?

Yes. A practical combined workflow is to keep verified career facts and application tracking organized in one place while using the other platform for a specific resume-design or editing need. Avoid maintaining conflicting versions of your employment history.

Does either tool guarantee ATS passage or interviews?

No. Both products provide tools intended to improve resume quality, tailoring, or matching, but neither can guarantee how an employer's ATS will process a document or whether a recruiter will advance an application.

How should I compare the free trial terms?

Use the current official Help Center and checkout screen rather than an old comparison page. Teal offers a Free Forever tier, while Enhancv's official pages currently use inconsistent 7-day and 14-day trial language.

Why does PDF versus DOCX matter?

It matters because some recruiters, career services teams, or application portals request an editable Word file. Teal's current export documentation is PDF-only, and Enhancv also centers its output workflow on PDF, so a separate editable-file process may be necessary.

Final takeaway: Teal and Enhancv are better understood as overlapping platforms with different workflow centers. Teal's current documentation emphasizes a connected job-search system with unlimited free tracking and resume creation, while Enhancv emphasizes resume presentation, AI-assisted editing, ATS feedback, and an expanding application-management layer. The most reliable comparison is the one that matches the product to your bottleneck, verifies current billing terms, and checks the exported document before submission.

Official references: Teal pricing ; Teal export help ; Enhancv pricing ; Enhancv free-version help . For deeper analysis on parser compatibility, see our Teal vs Rezi ATS optimization review and our Jobscan vs Teal ATS scanner comparison.